Questions? +1 (202) 335-3939 Login
Trusted News Since 1995
A service for movie industry professionals · Thursday, June 20, 2019 · 488,566,642 Articles · 3+ Million Readers

What is the future of AR/MR display core tech? Waveguide vs Birdbath vs Off-axis system, is iGlass USA winning the race?

Optical see-through AR/MR display core tech, histrory and the state of arts: Waveguide vs Birdbath vs Off-axis Reflector

Optical see-through AR/MR display core tech, histrory and the state of arts: Waveguide vs Birdbath vs Off-axis Reflector

iGlass ultra-high-image-quality near-eye-display technology is the next generation of Big Screen display core tech

MILPITAS, CA, USA, June 8, 2019 /EINPresswire.com/ -- Generally speaking, there are three competing optical see-through AR/MR Display Core Tech, namely, Waveguide, Birdbath, Off-axis Reflector, competing to be the king of next generation of big-screen display core tech, offering consumers as Monitor screen, LCD TV, Laser TV and Movie Theater screen replacement.

1) Waveguide optical architect. It has its pros but comes with the following limitations:
• FOV is not large enough (between 30° and 52° in a diagonal direction),
• System resolution (MTF of the whole system) is typically quite low due to diffraction optical limitations,
• Inaccurate color, hard to show single color uniform background well, i.e., a white background would show as a messy colorful background,
• Very expensive (i.e., HoloLens is well over $3000, MagicLeap one is at $2295), not really for consumer uses.


2) Birdbath optical architect. Birdbath has a very long and rich history, while it has its pros, it comes with the following limitations:
• It has a fundamental privacy leaking issue, as others can see the display content from outside, from all directions,
• FOV is quite similar to waveguide technology, not large enough (between 40° and 55° in a diagonal direction),
• The optics are too close to the user’s eye area. The system typically put weight (i.e., >85g or even 100g) on the load-sensitive-human-nose (i.e., typical prescription eye-glasses weight is <30g), uncomfortable to use,
• Also due to the optics is too close to the user’s eye area, the heat generating display unit together with the driving electronics are touching the user’s sensitive skin area near the eye, hot as burning. For these reasons, Birdbath architect is typically for short period user cases, not suitable for long period consumer user cases like movie watching or gaming, etc.,
• It does not fit daily myopia glasses thus not convenient for many,
• Its eye box is typically quite small, quite easy to lose


3) Off-axis Reflector optical architect. Historically, Off-axis Reflector was used in the Military thanks to its ultra-wide field of view (FOV) characteristics, i.e., Off-axis Reflector was used in pilot training program during World War 2, and were used on the F35 joint fighter information helmet, where the size and cost was not a big problem for the pilot. For example, the F35 joint fighter AR helmet was over 3 lbs, and cost about $400,000 each. To make it work, each pilot’s head needs to be individually scanned! (No problem as an air-force device)

At around the 2014 - 2016 period, SmokeVR HMD and MetaVision tried to transfer the military technology into the consumer space, by shrinking the form-factor and cost down. However, the Off-axis Reflector at the time suffered a set of problems:
• The relatively low image quality (system MTF) as Off-axis systems tend to have large image distortion and the image quality drops dramatically as the system goes “off-axis”. To overcome the limitations, an image formation method called “Free-Form Reflector” was necessary, but the Free-Form Reflector technique was so new and uncommon to most experts in the field (other than a few folks in the academia doing research, etc.), people just started exploring how to make Free-Form Reflector work. And there were simply too many unknowns on how to design/produce/test high quality non-traditional Free-Form Reflector, etc.
• For the same reason, the image plane of the early “infant” Free-Form Reflector tend to very close to the mirror itself, i.e., forming an image at about 1-foot to 1.5-foot from the Mirror itself. When the users of the HMD put the device on, they will find the image is right in front of their eye. This very close by image distance issue made the HMD hardly useful, as the users feel as if they were standing right in front of a big screen and the contents were simply way too close-by to be comfortable watched,
• If the software renders the content to further away (depth) anyway, the image became fuzzy too quickly, thus only large font/course content is viewable,
• The above image quality issue and image distance issue, when coupled with the other factors below, basically killed the Off-axis Reflector system:
• Even though significantly smaller than the military helmet, the end system was still too bulky from a 2016 standard,
• Even though significantly lighter than the military helmet, the end system was still too heavy from a 2016 standard, i.e., at 570g for Metavision’s AR headset,
• Even though significantly cheaper than the military helmet, the end system was still too expensive for consumer space, i.e., at $1495 for Metavision’s AR headset.

Due to the above constraints, Off-Axis Reflector AR architect did not attract too much attention in the industry, most experts in the field simply thought this technical path was fundamentally flawed, with low image quality, and it is way too large and heavy for any civilian application. Thus, there is little development effort in this technology direction.

Things changed in 2019, a startup in Milpitas, CA, called “iGlass USA inc” showed off their palm-sized small, 200-inch gigantic screen size, 120g feather-light XGlass with “Ultra-high-image-quality beating any waveguide systems and Birdbath systems ever in exist” at multiple professional conferences, including SID 2019 in San Jose and AWE 2019 in Santa Clara.

iGlass USA uses their actual device proved that all those previous issues associated with the Off-axis Reflector AR Display Core tech can be solved through years of dedicated research and development.

iGlass also let people eye witnessed how high image quality and how small and light the Off-axis Reflector AR display tech is cable of achieving. Iglass USA is so confident about this technique’s potential, it even claimed that their upcoming iGlass Two will have another 35% higher image sharpness (system MTF) than their already very sharp UHD quality XGlass demonstrated.

Technology always leaps forward, and the art advances. Now the AR optical see-through display core tech competition race just got even hotter, which is good for consumers.


美国 iGlass 公司中文简介:
美国 iGlass 公司是一家位于美国硅谷的业界领先的增强现实和混合现实显示技术公司。该公司致力于推广iGlass下一代超高清移动眼前巨屏技术,推动增强现实和混合现实技术的实用化,在5G时代引领行业,把一般人眼中高科技含量十足的超清晰增强现实和混合现实眼镜产品普及,推向巨量的消费级市场。

下一代超高清大尺寸显示技术是什么?
是超高成像质量、个人化和强调隐私性、轻小舒适无眩晕、完全移动、2D/3D双模式、更低成本、更大尺寸而不占物理空间的iGlass开放式超清晰移动眼前巨屏.

iGlass公司产品具有如下三个特征: 超高成像质量大尺寸移动显示技术全球领先,产品定位精准,市场需求巨大。

Sam Yuan
iGlass USA inc
+1 510-299-8001
email us here
Visit us on social media:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

iGlass is plam-sized small, light-weight at 120g, portable, private, 2D/3D dual mode, with 200" UHD 4K screen, suitable as LCD TV, Laser TV, Theater Replacement

Powered by EIN Presswire


EIN Presswire does not exercise editorial control over third-party content provided, uploaded, published, or distributed by users of EIN Presswire. We are a distributor, not a publisher, of 3rd party content. Such content may contain the views, opinions, statements, offers, and other material of the respective users, suppliers, participants, or authors.

Submit your press release